In the world of American politics, it’s no secret that the Democratic Party has, at times, been criticized for backing candidates who don’t inspire widespread confidence. The most glaring example in recent memory is Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign. Even as concerns mounted over his cognitive acuity, the party and its establishment threw their full weight behind him, opting to gamble on a familiar face rather than taking a chance on fresh leadership. Now, as the announcements grow louder that Kamala Harris will be the party’s next nominee, one can’t help but wonder if history is about to repeat itself. Are Democrats about to back another candidate destined to struggle on the national stage?
Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential bid was a campaign that started with great promise but quickly fizzled out, leaving her in the political dust long before the first primary vote was cast. The reasons for her early exit were numerous and well-documented, and they raise serious concerns about her viability as a candidate with her becoming the party’s choice in 2024.
One of the most glaring issues during her 2020 campaign was inconsistent messaging and policy positions. Harris found herself in a constant tug-of-war between the party’s progressive and moderate factions, never quite landing on a platform that resonated strongly with either. Her back-and-forth on “Medicare for All” was emblematic of this struggle—initially supporting Bernie Sanders’ plan, only to later propose a more centrist version that satisfied no one. This inconsistency in policy left voters unsure of what Harris truly stood for, a problem that could easily resurface if she were to run again.
Adding to her woes was a disorganized campaign structure plagued by internal strife. Reports of infighting and high staff turnover revealed a campaign in turmoil, struggling to maintain a coherent strategy. Effective leadership starts with a well-oiled campaign machine, and Harris’s team fell far short of that mark. The question remains: what has changed since then? If anything, the stakes are even higher now, and a repeat of such organizational chaos could spell disaster for her chances.
Perhaps the most critical flaw in Harris’s 2020 run was her failure to define a clear identity. Voters never quite knew who Kamala Harris was as a candidate. Was she the tough-on-crime prosecutor from California, or the progressive champion fighting for social justice? This identity crisis prevented her from building a strong, loyal base of support. In a race where authenticity and clarity are key, Harris’s inability to project a definitive persona was a significant handicap.
Even more troubling was her inability to gain traction with voters, particularly in key early primary states like Iowa and New Hampshire. Despite initial momentum, her support dwindled as the campaign wore on, and she failed to connect with the very voters she needed to win over. This lack of grassroots enthusiasm is a warning sign that should not be ignored. Even with a boost in fundraising and party backing this time around, enthusiasm from voters is something that money and endorsements can’t buy.
Lastly, there were fundraising challenges that hampered her 2020 campaign, forcing her to make tough decisions about where and how to compete. While it’s true that there has been a shift in her fundraising abilities since becoming Vice President, money isn’t everything. If the underlying issues—her messaging, organization, and voter appeal—haven’t changed, then more funds will only delay the inevitable.
The Democratic Party, having rallied behind Joe Biden despite significant concerns, now seems poised to repeat the same mistake with Kamala Harris. The fact that she has spent the last four years as Vice President, largely perceived as accomplishing little, only adds to the skepticism. What makes the party think that this time around, things will be any different? And perhaps more importantly, what makes them think voters will be convinced that she’s the answer?
As the political landscape continues to evolve, with candidates like Robert Kennedy Jr. running as an Independent, we are indeed entering uncharted waters. Will Democrats stick with the establishment choice, or will voters be drawn to a candidate outside the traditional party lines? Could we be witnessing the start of a significant shift in American politics, where limited government conservatism squares off against big government authoritarianism, with an Independent wildcard thrown into the mix?
The road ahead is unpredictable, and the outcome is far from certain. One thing is clear, though: the stakes have never been higher, and the choices made in the coming months will shape the future of the nation in profound ways. Crazy times, indeed.
Add comment
Comments